However, the choices of Hardware depends upon the users budget, and to attain maximum performance; you have to splash the cash.

But if you are looking for an average build that will do the trick for your average quality video editing, then we have a list of Hardware that can easily fit your tight budget.

Meanwhile, Adobe Premiere Pro is also functional on the Operating system, but still, if you can run Final Cut Pro easily, then maybe you would not choose Premiere Pro at all.

But to max out the performance, you should add a low capacity SSD to install your program and run on it.

On top of it, a proper cooling system will do the trick to keep your pc cool and maintaining the temperature to restrain the load on it.

I have a maxed out 2012 iMac and it never uses above 60 or so of the CPU.

For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.

Im a videographer and my workflow includes Final Cut Pro X, Compressor, Adobe Encore, and a handful of post applications (Magic Bullet, CrumplePop plugins, etc.) What hardware specs most influence rendering times Is it the CPU, the amount of RAM, the graphics card Are they all equal in importance for video work, or is one more crucial to have than the other Im currently running on a couple-years-old MacBook Pro thats starting to lag quite a bit and looking to upgrade, but want to make sure Im putting my money towards the specs that matter most for my work.

Wondering if anyone can offer their expertise on this subject.

For me the bottleneck is rendering time, and since it hits all my processing cores at 100 Id say the CPU is most important.

For rendering you want the most available cores (hyperthreaded i7 if possible).

There is some variation -- a lower-compression codec like MPEG2 will do more IO, and a higher-compression codec like H.264 will do less IO and more CPU.

Processor For Video Editing Software That Tries

There is some software that tries to offload rendering to GPU, but this must be explicitly coded and youd have to evaluate the software and actual benefit.

Newer Intel processors have Quick Sync instructions which in theory can improve rendering performance by 500 to 800.

However it only works with certain codecs, and to date editing suites have poorly supported this.

To my knowledge neither Premiere Pro CC or the latest Final Cut Pro X support Quick Sync, although there are some add-in libraries which do.

You will also probably want more memory, but that can be added later.

While GPU affects.

GPU) And RAM affects.

Sorry for the newbie questions, I got into video work when my workflow was pretty simple, so i never had to really know the whats or whys of my hardware.

Typically rendering is CPU-bound, not IO, memory, or GPU-bound.

This came in one of the recent major updates, maybe 10.0.6 or so.

So a high end GPU will definitely help.

Final cut still does not adequately take advantage of all available cores and threads (not sure why, but it doesnt).

Processor For Video Editing Free Programs Like

Apple is horrible in this area, whereas free programs like handbrake do use all cores without problem.

Processor Mac For Video Editing